Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20316 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2006 17:40:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2006 17:40:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 71514 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 17:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 71481 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 17:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 71470 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2006 17:40:31 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:40:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.151] (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:40:30 -0700 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7HHdtNA003235 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:39:55 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k7HHdsv7190704 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:39:54 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7HHds4p030399 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:39:54 -0600 Received: from [9.72.134.59] (MARSDEN-IBM-LT1.usca.ibm.com [9.72.134.59]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7HHdsB4030387 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:39:54 -0600 Message-ID: <44E4A9E6.7050909@sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:39:50 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden Reply-To: kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: Regression Search And Destroy Contest Update Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello Derby Users, I wanted to send out an update on the Regression Search and Destroy contest and make a most urgent appeal for user testing for 10.2. The contest page is at: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/RegressionSearchAndDestroy 10.2 beta is available now at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.2.1.0-beta/ . First of all, I want to tell you that I have the chocolate ready to send out to the winners at the end of the contest (71% Cocoa Organic Dark Chocolate from the Grenada Chocolate Company, yum yum!). The 10.2 branch has been cut, the target release date is still listed as September 19 (Yikes!) , and your chocolate is waiting, so there is absolutely no time to waste before you test 10.2. - Download the Beta from http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.2.1.0-beta/ . - Record your application testing results on http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoApplicationTesting (even if it is good news) or post to derby-user. - List regressions identified by you and others and other work ease upgrade to 10.2 on the Wiki at: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/RegressionSearchAndDestroy Secondly I want to report very mixed results on the success of the contest and user feedback for 10.2. 1) Good news is we have found and fixed quite a few serious regressions. See the contest page for some of them. http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/RegressionSearchAndDestroy 2) Bad news is we have had very limited user feedback. I can't recall seeing any posts on derby-user about 10.2 and no new entries on http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoApplicationTesting since my last update. And I think (may be wrong) that only one of our regressions actually came from a user, the rest were from development. My feeling is that we need much, much, much more user testing and with current plans it needs to be concentrated into an extremely short time period, too short to feel confident about the release IMHO. But through the miracle of open source scalability, if we light a spark and get this going, who knows... If you have a performance sensitive or memory sensitive application, you simply *need* to try 10.2. There have been great performance improvements, improvements in network lob streaming etc, but these types of changes entail a lot of code churn so please, please, please run your tests against 10.2. I'll be out for a while and will probably miss the 10.2 vote and the rest of the contest. I hope the judges will ping this list from time to time with updates and that users send the results of their testing and spread the word about 10.2 beta. Also please take action or post your ideas on how to encourage 10.2 users testing and perhaps get other projects using derby to test with 10.2. 10.2 beta can be downloaded at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.2.1.0-beta/. Thanks Kathey Note: The unofficial nightly builds that I have pointed to before at http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Derby/builds/ are for the trunk so will say 10.3, but have all of the latest greatest 10.2 content. I don't think there are builds set up yet for the 10.2 branch.