db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mamta Satoor" <msat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Derby vs. Hypersonic SQL
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:38:18 GMT
Duncan,

Grant/revoke functionality is targeted for upcoming Derby 10.2 release.

Mamta


On 8/29/06, Duncan Groenewald <duncangroenewald@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
> I have used both and now rely on McKoiDB for the majority of work.
> While it lacks one or two features it has proven to be very stable and
> reliable.  Derby lacks a couple of key features I needed, especially no
> user access control (GRANT, REVOKE).
>
> I found Hypersonic's persistent to be unreliable and gave up after
> experiencing corruption on a number of databases.
>
> I started a simple evaluation document to compare key features I needed
> which might help.  Send me your email address and I'll forward you a
> copy if you would like.
>
> Regards
> Duncan
>
> Robert Enyedi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a MySQL database with around 50 tables and we are thinking
> > about supporting other database engines too. After studying the
> > options on the Java DB engine implementations, it seems that there are
> > two important contenders: Apache Derby and Hypersonic SQL. While our
> > feeling is that Hypersonic SQL is a more mature product, Derby seems
> > to be hyped about a lot these days and it also has quite some history
> > since the days of Informix and Cloudscape.
> >
> > Could you please help in our decision by pointing out some advantages
> > and shortcomings of Apache Derby versus Hypersonic SQL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Robert
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message