db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dag.Wan...@Sun.COM (Dag H. Wanvik)
Subject Re: Javadoc lies
Date Tue, 09 May 2006 01:12:42 GMT
Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM> writes:

> Thanks to Andrew, Craig, and David for your responses.

> i) We would generate the JDBC3 api using the 1.4 javadoc tool. The
> missing subclass references shouldn't confuse customers because the
> subclasses wouldn't appear in the JDBC3 api.
> ii) We would generate the JDBC4 api using the 1.6 javadoc tool. This
> api would not contain the lying classes from the JDBC3 api.
> iii) We would bolt a webpage on top of the top apis, explaining which
> api to consult, based on the client VM.
> Does this sound acceptable?



View raw message