db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stanley Bradbury <Stan.Bradb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [WWD] Check of edits from : Review of Final Chapters (5 and 6)
Date Tue, 09 May 2006 18:26:12 GMT
John, as always, your suggestions are helpful,  thank you.  I will use 
your improved wording in quote 2.
  [EOM]

John Embretsen wrote:

> Stanley Bradbury wrote:
>
>> John and other derby-users -
>>
>> I have rewritten the two the paragraphs mentioned above to address 
>> the points made by John.  Please let me know what you think.
>> quote 1 from "Activity notes", p.6 (8)  REWRITE:
>> In a client / server environment the client program is often used 
>> from other computers on the network. ...
>
>
> Sounds good, although it probably does not say everything you 
> originally intended to say here.
>
>> quote 2 from "Activity notes", p.6 (8) REWRITE:
>> Derby's two architectures have caused confusion for some new Derby 
>> users. They mistakenly think that embedded is a single user 
>> configuration. This is not true. The embedded driver supports 
>> multiple simultaneous connections, performs locking and provides 
>> performance, integrity and recoverability. Any embedded application 
>> can open multiple Derby connections and then provide a means for 
>> multiple users to interact with the database on each connection. The 
>> Derby Network Server is an example of such an application.
>
>
> Very good! Though I think the term "any embedded application" can be 
> ambiguous. Is "any application using the embedded driver" better?
>
>



Mime
View raw message