Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35395 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 18:53:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 18:53:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 45010 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 18:53:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 44969 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 18:53:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 44957 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2006 18:53:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:53:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.146] (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:53:51 -0800 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1FIrUY4017711 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:30 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k1FIrURX204298 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:30 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1FIrU7I021372 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:30 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-107-158.mts.ibm.com [9.48.107.158]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1FIrRYx021254 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <43F378A0.2010409@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:53:20 -0800 From: Mike Matrigali Reply-To: mikem_app@sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade? References: <5F3EBBC316C84F49A35B29023D459932E91052@SLNTEXG.quadrian.com> In-Reply-To: <5F3EBBC316C84F49A35B29023D459932E91052@SLNTEXG.quadrian.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alex Miller wrote: > I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is > critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode. > Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when > running in this mode. Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any > tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware > of). > > Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases > from a zip file. My company would love to ship some example databases > in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. > > Alex Miller > Chief Architect > MetaMatrix > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:13 PM > To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development > Subject: upcoming 10.2 release > > Dear Derby user community, > > Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing > and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April > 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would > estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after > feature freeze. > > Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to > you and which you would like to see fixed in this release. > > Thanks, > -Rick > >