db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Satheesh Bandaram <sathe...@Sourcery.Org>
Subject Re: is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade?
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:15:28 GMT
Mike, I missed your question... which was in the subject. The issue I
fixed is different... It was about soft upgrade failing on readonly


Mike Matrigali wrote:

> Alex Miller wrote:
>> I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is
>> critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode.
>> Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when
>> running in this mode.  Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any
>> tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware
>> of). 
>> Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases
>> from a zip file.  My company would love to ship some example databases
>> in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. 
>> Alex Miller
>> Chief Architect
>> MetaMatrix
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday,
>> February 14, 2006 12:13 PM
>> To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development
>> Subject: upcoming 10.2 release
>> Dear Derby user community,
>> Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing
>> and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April
>> 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would
>> estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after
>> feature freeze.
>> Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to
>> you and which you would like to see fixed in this release.
>> Thanks,
>> -Rick

View raw message