db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade?
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:53:20 GMT


Alex Miller wrote:
> I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is
> critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode.
> Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when
> running in this mode.  Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any
> tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware
> of).  
> 
> Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases
> from a zip file.  My company would love to ship some example databases
> in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug.  
> 
> Alex Miller
> Chief Architect
> MetaMatrix
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:13 PM
> To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development
> Subject: upcoming 10.2 release
> 
> Dear Derby user community,
> 
> Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing
> and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April
> 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would
> estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after
> feature freeze.
> 
> Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to
> you and which you would like to see fixed in this release.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Rick
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message