db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Legolas Woodland <legola...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Can some one compare Ingres 2006 and Derby ?
Date Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:46 GMT
Michael Segel wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 4:10 pm, Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
>   
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legolas Woodland wrote (2006-02-14
01:21:39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>> Hi
>>> Thank you for reading my post.
>>> Today Ingres announced its Ingres 2006 ,
>>> Can some one do a fast or in depth comparison between this two product?
>>>       
>> Fast comparision:
>> 	Derby is Java
>> 	Derby may be embedded
>>
>>     
> That's not a comparison.
>
> Ingres to Derby is an apples to oranges comparison. 
> Two totally different beasts.
>
> Note that this includes licensing agreements.
>
> Derby is released under Apache. Meaning you can do pretty much what you want 
> to do with it, just include some legalease embedded in your shrink wrap.
>
>   
I asked mostly about their features , things like scalability , 
availability , performance under high load ,
performance on very large tables with 10s of  millions of records .
sql richness , ...

>> Not so fast comparision: An in depth comparision requires a lot of
>> work. You are welcome to contribute. A nice starting point:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/SQLvsDerbyFeatures. Then try to get
>> somtehing similar for Ingres 2006 and the SQL-part should be
>> covered. Then there's the rest.
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message