db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lance J. Andersen" <Lance.Ander...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Why are classpath databases always read-only ?
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:24:10 GMT
There is no requirement that an app can write to the directory where the 
internal version of a web app is stored in an app server

Oyvind.Bakksjo@sun.com wrote:

>>> Maybe you could explain how this would work? Are you assuming that the
>>> war/ear file is always unpacked into the local file system? Is that
>>> guaranteed for a J2EE server?
>>
>>
>>
>> No I cannot assume that, but if (and my guess it should be possible to
>> determine where a resource loaded from the classpath came from, e.g.
>> whether the URL contains a jar: protocol) then this would work. And if
>> not, it can obviously not be written. But for servlet containers like
>> Tomcat and Jetty, one can ensure that the web app is unpackaged before
>> it is started.
>
>
> Even if the web app is exploded, are you sure that the web app has 
> write access to the directory to which the servlet container has 
> exploded it? I'm not saying it doesn't, I just wouldn't be surprised 
> if some container didn't want the contents of that directory to change.
>
> I don't think using an absolute path to the db is awfully ugly as long 
> as it can be configured, e.g. as a context-param.
>

Mime
View raw message