Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of michaelm001@frontiernet.net
 designates 66.133.182.166 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <437DE950.3050206@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:46:40 -0800
From: Michael McCutcheon <michaelm001@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: SV: Is Hibernate inappropriate for embedded databases?
References: <PIEJKGGBBEFEJOHPCAHDOEJKCEAA.henrik@vocab.se>
In-Reply-To: <PIEJKGGBBEFEJOHPCAHDOEJKCEAA.henrik@vocab.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

But what about the 'double caching' problems for an embedded scenario?


Henrik Johansson wrote:

>I tried JBoss Embedded which uses Hibernate for a small test
>and it worked like a charm with Derby.
>
>Using Hibernate alone (or with JBoss Embedded) seems to be a
>very good idea in my opinion for all sorts of reasons.
>
>Too bad its seemingly not production ready...
>
>Hibernate alone would be clever since it is very well tested and
>there is no idea to reinvent the wheel.
>
>/ Henrik
>
>
>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>Fr�n: Michael McCutcheon [mailto:michaelm001@frontiernet.net]
>Skickat: den 18 november 2005 05:33
>Till: Derby Discussion
>�mne: Is Hibernate inappropriate for embedded databases?
>
>
>I'm still struggling to figure out if I should go with strait JDBC,
>stored procedures or something like Hibernate for my data access/update
>in my web app running on Tomcat.
>
>I've been looking at Hibernate, and it seems that it's claim to fame is
>all of the fancy caching it can do to speed performance.
>
>However, doesn't derby itself cache data in memory (once the data is
>accessed)?
>
>If the caching functionality in Hibernate is used for an embedded
>database, doesn't that just mean that the data will be cached twice
>(once in derby, once in hibernate), resulting in memory bloat and
>potentially worse performance?
>
>Any thoughts on this issue would be appreciated.
>
>Mike
>
>
>
>
>  
>