Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97868 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 23:06:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 23:06:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 88593 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2005 23:06:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 88571 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2005 23:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 88560 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2005 23:06:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:06:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.141] (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:06:03 -0800 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA8N5mNf013735 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:05:48 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id jA8N5mPp107152 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:05:48 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8N5mGb012732 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:05:48 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-114-51.mts.ibm.com [9.48.114.51]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA8N5hs0012331 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:05:47 -0500 Message-ID: <43712F41.2040301@debrunners.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:05:37 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: I need some advice to choose database for an upcomming job References: <87ee9b170510290729o58425b8fh4f3d7f03cce0ac29@mail.gmail.com> <4363A109.7010106@bristowhill.com> <87ee9b170510291308v1e168e8av53b79ff9d18242cc@mail.gmail.com> <43650BBA.7000809@bristowhill.com> <43661621.3030403@sun.com> <87ee9b170511050404l20380304w4ff9905fcc2296c3@mail.gmail.com> <436F3EEF.6050008@sun.com> <436F4105.3080908@debrunners.com> <436F9254.5030003@sun.com> <436FA914.4060900@debrunners.com> <17263.55842.254652.143538@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <43705AB0.3020300@debrunners.com> <4370BB44.1060303@sun.com> <43712186.7090406@debrunners.com> <4371292E.6020908@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <4371292E.6020908@sun.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Lance J. Andersen wrote: > The JDBC 3 spec intermixed when a ResultSet was closed with auto-commit > semantics and these both are seperate scenarios. These should have been > seperated. Yep. > The verbage in JDBC 3 WRT to having another Statement executed on the > same connection was not explict WRT auto commit as it was written and > led to confusion. I see that now, I'd always read that as only if auto-commit was true, but I can see that it's not clear. > > Perhaps 1 more bullet could be added to clarify this *specific* scenario > as to the state of the ResultSet, i will see. Sounds good. Thanks, Dan.