Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49079 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2005 18:21:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2005 18:21:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 5544 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2005 18:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 5516 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2005 18:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 5505 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2005 18:21:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:21:47 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [65.195.181.50] (HELO webRack01.Segel.com) (65.195.181.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:23:19 -0800 Received: by webRack01.Segel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 835F6166D3; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:26:59 -0600 (CST) From: Michael Segel Organization: MSCC To: "Derby Discussion" Subject: Good vs Evil? Maybe I'm looking at this from a skewed perspective? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:26:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <87ee9b170511221239g2a808f8elbb7e4d9987e2fd2d@mail.gmail.com> <43839983.1030304@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43839983.1030304@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511231326.59220.msegel@segel.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tuesday 22 November 2005 16:19, Stanley Bradbury wrote: > > From JDBC you can use java.sql.Statement.getGeneratedKeys(). See this > link for an example: > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cscv/v10r1/topic/com.ibm.cloudsc= ap >e.doc/crefjavstateautogen.html > > A description of IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL function can be found at: > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cscv/v10r1/topic/com.ibm.cloudsc= ap >e.doc/rrefidentityvallocal.html#rrefidentityvallocal Hmmm I had forgotten about the .getGeneratedKeys(). The reason I'm following up on this post is the URL that you point to in yo= ur=20 response. Its a great resource, but something I saw caught my eye and I was thinking= =20 about it while I was out walking the doggies.... =46rom the IBM web site: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cscv/v10r1/index.jsp?topic=3D/com.= ibm.cloudscape.doc/crefjavstateautogen.html " IBM=C2=AE Cloudscape=E2=84=A2 is a relational database management system = that is based on =09 Java=E2=84=A2 and SQL. Cloudscape is a commercial release of the Apache So= ftware =09 Foundation's (ASF) open source relational database project. The Apache=20 project is called Derby. The Cloudscape product includes Derby without any modification whatsoever = to=20 the underlying source code. Cloudscape includes the same core Derby engine= =20 but provides a few features you won't find in the Derby software such as=20 installers (with a JRE) and translated manuals and error messages. In=20 addition, technical support is available for purchase for the Cloudscape=20 product through IBM. " This kind of confused me for a sec. Is IBM continuing to release/resell Cloudscape? Does it mean that Cloudscape will match Derby in fixes or will IBM make=20 corrections to Cloudscape that are not going to be made to Derby? Just looking for some clarification. =2D-=20 Michael Segel Principal=20 MSCC 312 952- 8175 [M]