db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David W. Van Couvering" <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Question about using URLClassLoader and Derby
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:33:36 GMT
Thanks, Craig.  One comment below...

Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Kathey,
> The approach looks good. More comments below.
> On Nov 9, 2005, at 9:14 AM, David W. Van Couvering wrote:
>> Hi, Kathey.  At first glance it looks good to me.  I'm assuming *all* 
>> classes your app needs are available to the from the URL you specify, 
>> because you are not specifying a parent classloader when you create it.  
> As I understand it, the only classes that need to be available via the 
> special classloader are the Derby implementation classes and its 
> dependencies. JDBC is a pretty good abstraction layer that uses 
> pass-by-value semantics not pass-by-reference semantics, so as long as 
> you're not using user classes inside your database you should be ok.

Hm, user classes may be used in stored procedures, right?

View raw message