From derby-user-return-1961-apmail-db-derby-user-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Fri Sep 09 18:26:47 2005
Return-Path: <derby-user-return-1961-apmail-db-derby-user-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61835 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2005 18:26:47 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2005 18:26:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 60844 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 18:26:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60824 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 18:26:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:derby-user-help@db.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-user@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-user.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60811 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2005 18:26:45 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:26:45 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of denials@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.204 as permitted sender)
Received: from [72.14.204.204] (HELO qproxy.gmail.com) (72.14.204.204)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:26:58 -0700
Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q12so69057qbq
        for <derby-user@db.apache.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Ey0shk0+cRJh+eaCplDxyY3YalO7Rs4RBE+PHCLzrleeePcQ2PrNRF6oxpdJonZ3CgHZPzEKboICeCqsWVDSZlPgL2tuXSSOwA6L02Iasl1Y5fj+vzrG1kosZom0eN1GZK6FKWNJ8JyiWmC2Fz+U2vcOZ+3uR1/PxNL9dPx5kc0=
Received: by 10.64.199.8 with SMTP id w8mr2660qbf;
        Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.251.3 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fbb0d11d05090911265016358c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:26:43 -0400
From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
Reply-To: denials@gmail.com
To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Are you happy with Derby?
In-Reply-To: <200509091320.18126.msegel@segel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4321CB38.4020001@cisco.com> <200509091320.18126.msegel@segel.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 9/9/05, Michael J. Segel <msegel@segel.com> wrote:
>=20

<snip>

> The only drawback is that Derby is under GPL. So as long as you follow GP=
L's
> rules, you're ok.

Umm, not GPL -- Apache License, Version 2.0
(http://db.apache.org/derby/license.html). Major difference :)

Dan