Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
From: "Michael J. Segel" <msegel@segel.com>
To: "Derby Discussion" <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Ability to create a unique index on the same column,
 doc bug or "bug" bug?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:47:11 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <20050824233332.81997.qmail@web81305.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050824233332.81997.qmail@web81305.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200508241947.11516.msegel@segel.com>

On Wednesday 24 August 2005 18:33, Susan Cline wrote:
> I just logged DERBY-539 as a documentation enhancement request.   I think
> if the documentation explains more clearly the behavior of the product it
> will help our users when they observe something they might not intuitively
> understand when first using the product.
>
> Susan
>
> "Michael J. Segel" <msegel@segel.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 August 2005 13:20, Susan Cline wrote:
>

Sigh.

How is this behavior any different from any other database? 

I think my frustration is that Derby/Cloudscape is acting as expected.

Did you try your sample tests against DB2? Informix? Sybase? Oracle?(ick!)

Sorry to seem like a pain, but I guess that bathtub gin really did rot my 
brains. ;-)

-- 
Michael Segel
Principal
MSCC
(312) 952-8175