Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <424349C6.9040901@netvisage.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:14:14 -0800
From: "Mark W. Davis" <mwd@netvisage.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE]  Reject tally of logo votes
References: <424310B7.3090106@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <424310B7.3090106@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-1

Kathey Marsden wrote:

>It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under such a cloud of suspicion.  So I would like to call  a vote to reject this tally.  I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue either technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish that this tally is incorrect.  Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions can determine how to best choose a logo.
>
>
>  
>
>>>Logo 32 = 20 votes
>>>Logo 35 = 12 votes
>>>None of the above = 18 votes
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>Vote 
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Kathey
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
one is what one does
Mark W. Davis