Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72685 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 20:08:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 20:08:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 34332 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 20:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 34058 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 20:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 34044 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2005 20:08:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web81303.mail.yahoo.com (HELO web81303.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.37.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:08:20 -0800 Message-ID: <20050329200817.40866.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [32.97.110.142] by web81303.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:08:17 PST Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:08:17 -0800 (PST) From: Susan Cline Subject: Re: Derby logo contest -- retry To: Derby Discussion In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-101823707-1112126897=:39996" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --0-101823707-1112126897=:39996 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I like this suggestion, it will give folks a chance to get their second wind before resubmitting. As an aside, it might be nice to take into consideration how logos look when they are made into very small images. Some of the original submissions had images that would have been unrecognizable if shrunk into a very small format. Susan Jeremy Boynes wrote: Given the large number of "None of the above" votes I would suggest we re-open submissions for another month and restart the process on 5/1/05. -- Jeremy Jean T. Anderson wrote: > How should we proceed? > In parallel, we might consider reopening logo submission. I noticed > during voting that some people added info such as "want logo N, but > _without_ the feather" or "want logo N, but _with_ a feather". Do we > want to reopen submission so logo artists can incorporate suggested > modifications (or not)? > > -jean --0-101823707-1112126897=:39996 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

I like this suggestion, it will give folks a chance to get their second wind before resubmitting.

As an aside, it might be nice to take into consideration how logos look when they are made into very small images. Some of the original submissions had images that would have been unrecognizable if shrunk into a very small format.

Susan

Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:

Given the large number of "None of the above" votes I would suggest we
re-open submissions for another month and restart the process on 5/1/05.

--
Jeremy

Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> How should we proceed?
> In parallel, we might consider reopening logo submission. I noticed
> during voting that some people added info such as "want logo N, but
> _without_ the feather" or "want logo N, but _with_ a feather". Do we
> want to reopen submission so logo artists can incorporate suggested
> modifications (or not)?
>
> -jean

--0-101823707-1112126897=:39996--