Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54131 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 22:28:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 22:28:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 46124 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 22:28:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46104 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 22:28:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 46083 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2005 22:28:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ms002msg.fastwebnet.it (HELO ms002msg.fastwebnet.it) (213.140.2.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:28:31 -0800 Received: from HAL9000 (41.17.232.65) by ms002msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.052.3) id 41FFB3EA005389CE for derby-user@db.apache.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: <002901c534ae$887303c0$41e81129@HAL9000> From: "Roberto micca" To: "Derby Discussion" References: <20050329200817.40866.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com> <001601c534ad$972e55f0$41e81129@HAL9000> Subject: Re: Derby logo contest -- retry Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:27:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01C534BF.4AB06800" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C534BF.4AB06800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another one rule could be to use a push strategy to vote.... Send a mail requesting a vote to a logo suggesting a range of choices... So all subscripting are invited to vote. It seem as spam but... could be = a system to avoid new subscribers and give to lurkers a possibility to = give a signal. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roberto micca=20 To: Derby Discussion=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:20 AM Subject: Re: Derby logo contest -- retry hmmm... I propose an additional rules :D Cleaning up all logos to resubmit new ones in two formats = Normal/Medium and Small , following susan suggestion... i think right = dimensions as 320x200 and 160x100 or 80x50 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Susan Cline=20 To: Derby Discussion=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:08 PM Subject: Re: Derby logo contest -- retry I like this suggestion, it will give folks a chance to get their = second wind before resubmitting. =20 As an aside, it might be nice to take into consideration how logos = look when they are made into very small images. Some of the original = submissions had images that would have been unrecognizable if shrunk = into a very small format. Susan Jeremy Boynes wrote: Given the large number of "None of the above" votes I would = suggest we=20 re-open submissions for another month and restart the process on = 5/1/05. -- Jeremy Jean T. Anderson wrote: > How should we proceed? > In parallel, we might consider reopening logo submission. I = noticed=20 > during voting that some people added info such as "want logo N, = but=20 > _without_ the feather" or "want logo N, but _with_ a feather". = Do we=20 > want to reopen submission so logo artists can incorporate = suggested=20 > modifications (or not)? >=20 > -jean ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C534BF.4AB06800 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Another one rule could be to use a push = strategy to=20 vote....
 
Send a mail requesting a vote to a logo = suggesting=20 a range of choices...
So all subscripting are invited to = vote. It seem as=20 spam but... could be a system to avoid new subscribers and give to = lurkers a=20 possibility to give a signal.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Roberto micca
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 = 12:20=20 AM
Subject: Re: Derby logo contest = --=20 retry

hmmm...  I propose an additional = rules=20 :D
 
Cleaning up all logos to resubmit new = ones in two=20 formats Normal/Medium and Small , following susan suggestion... i = think right=20 dimensions as 320x200 and 160x100 or 80x50
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Susan Cline=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 = 10:08=20 PM
Subject: Re: Derby logo = contest --=20 retry

I like this suggestion, it will give folks a chance to get = their second=20 wind before resubmitting. 
 
As an aside, it might be nice to take into consideration how = logos look=20 when they are made into very small images.  Some of the = original=20 submissions had images that would have been unrecognizable if shrunk = into a=20 very small format.
 
Susan

Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> = wrote:
Given=20 the large number of "None of the above" votes I would suggest we=20
re-open submissions for another month and restart the process = on=20 5/1/05.

--
Jeremy

Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> = How=20 should we proceed?
> In parallel, we might consider = reopening logo=20 submission. I noticed
> during voting that some people = added info=20 such as "want logo N, but
> _without_ the feather" or "want = logo N,=20 but _with_ a feather". Do we
> want to reopen submission so = logo=20 artists can incorporate suggested
> modifications (or = not)?
>=20
> = -jean

------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C534BF.4AB06800--