-1
Kathey Marsden wrote:
>It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under such a cloud
of suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to reject this tally. I've heard lots of great
ideas on how to resolve this issue either technologically or socially but I think first we
need to establish that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions
can determine how to best choose a logo.
>
>
>
>
>>>Logo 32 = 20 votes
>>>Logo 35 = 12 votes
>>>None of the above = 18 votes
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Vote
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Kathey
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
one is what one does
Mark W. Davis
|