Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28340 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 17:19:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 17:19:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10096 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 17:19:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10049 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 17:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10029 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2004 17:19:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (hermes.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jta@bristowhill.com) Received: from [66.75.162.133] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:19:42 -0800 Received: from [192.168.2.51] (dt089n06.san.rr.com [204.210.25.6]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id iANGnHkM009319 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:49:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41A36A0D.4060207@bristowhill.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:49:17 -0800 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040819) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: Derby/Cloudscape GUI? References: <41A31222.4030303@inrialpes.fr> In-Reply-To: <41A31222.4030303@inrialpes.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Emmanuel Cecchet wrote: > ... > Just to let you know that we sucessfully used both Squirrel > (http://java-source.net/open-source/sql-clients/squirrel-sql-client) > and iSQL (http://java-source.net/open-source/sql-clients/isql-viewer) > with Derby. In fact, we were using Squirrel in C-JDBC but we dropped > it because it does not support transactions and iSQL is much nicer > (and it is also MPL instead of LGPL). > From our experience, I think that iSQL is a good choice. I'm trying to remember from our discussions at ApacheCon -- wasn't there an issue with getting iSQL working for SELECT statements? I'm vaguely recalling there was some sort of cursor compatibility issue. Feel free to tell me I dreamed this (information overload and all). Better yet, if I didn't dream it, how did you get it working? thanks! -jean