From derby-dev-return-119702-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@db.apache.org Sat Feb 9 16:45:23 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E568180677 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:45:22 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94830 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2019 16:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 94820 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2019 16:45:21 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:45:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 10285C2936 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:45:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.798 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9IIV6pM0k1M for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 74B195F564 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id k15so3154391pls.8 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 08:45:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=dU3ouGw8BsPeU/BmI9oUCOb7lFElSH5r61MNy4e9hb8=; b=dkDSrqUWlf1GFFisfwQCRM6owVFhNwoJ/AJZcTy/S26doE3ZclLRQpeJopPxfxzfVV OPvpqousIIwERyWxAPrYa6PslL1/qEIn8c4x3F6m73fLyVmHuuICOtX3Cnp1Ry+KBczH 0V7VRZCH69jDBlD2wG55AbYKohR407QVv0lcFfperOgOquS6h9fGkPCjYMbgmenRAecP 1g44s7h9BFSfwY0RCVhI6Rgc63OGXKB72Jur/g9w4jBPsdMW78+9s6nCtg0NS5GQgNrk JsFYyaXZCU4gpW8WjZfLJDMVDyKxNIxq4Q34rGMKp4X16iIocu6vdngRSN804BNYH5Ji UWCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=dU3ouGw8BsPeU/BmI9oUCOb7lFElSH5r61MNy4e9hb8=; b=LHei5EoYJCEI6ShwX23aMDioHY6/KAbA5iNiIyV/bWH/6mrhpk8UxxuSin5kiq97Tb ZF2eGARlq4YP48M5246NaDGQ1MmZiXfY73SQx5OOWNZQ9oN2NLnJBqH29OJ51PtZNE1d 22WPTxvqZV7x2RzFEYO49Waj0AeNtd6Wovit98V0Yr4KPeya75fryf/DlVKri15hyaDP mcfeWg2V95l36LSS8R5IvPvk/b3riVlAjkm/vQ7iHfz0oQE1/BhYc5rad6VQs/xdn0UC VXPRUgb4lvpgX6B/p4IaQEcZpIAxysgfjIuTcWQNDkxuwnA2K7fSMBasm4zppDuwR9+V qfxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZf51tBxkiye2dPuL649n6ubEfzfPZQOMozzfaQ5CQckW1EJolr n2bXuMWTwiOMptGw6o+MUjZvmUbp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZPtpHM0+Jec97r7QrmcJfP+15q7vHOv7HdfZ8lx5GX+jW9n6HHcvTa6n9seA6RgvO99Fh5uw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f91:: with SMTP id z17mr28537462plo.300.1549730718426; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 08:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from Richards-MBP-3.dc.rr.com (cpe-72-132-198-124.dc.res.rr.com. [72.132.198.124]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm6391195pgl.88.2019.02.09.08.45.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Feb 2019 08:45:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: 10.15 testing question To: derby-dev@db.apache.org References: From: Rick Hillegas Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 08:45:16 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CEC9B935E1B44AD2928677F1" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------CEC9B935E1B44AD2928677F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hey Bryan, Just want to confirm that you can upgrade to 10.15.1.3 WITHOUT that flag. I can upgrade old databases without setting the flag. If you can't, then I'd be interested in understanding the experiment you are running: clearly something would have to be wrong. In any event, here's the property which disables the "don't upgrade to an alpha version database" behavior:   -Dderby.database.allowPreReleaseUpgrade=true Hope I understood your question correctly. Thanks, -Rick On 2/8/19 5:49 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote: > Hi Rick, > > The last test that I want to run on the 10.15 release is to try > upgrading a couple of relatively old databases that I happen to have > hanging around. > > But I keep bumping into that restriction check that disallows > upgrading to a non-production release. > > Can you remind me how I work around this in order to test the upgrade > with the release candidate? > > thanks, > > bryan > --------------CEC9B935E1B44AD2928677F1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hey Bryan,

Just want to confirm that you can upgrade to 10.15.1.3 WITHOUT that flag. I can upgrade old databases without setting the flag. If you can't, then I'd be interested in understanding the experiment you are running: clearly something would have to be wrong.

In any event, here's the property which disables the "don't upgrade to an alpha version database" behavior:

  -Dderby.database.allowPreReleaseUpgrade=true

Hope I understood your question correctly.

Thanks,
-Rick



On 2/8/19 5:49 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Hi Rick,

The last test that I want to run on the 10.15 release is to try
upgrading a couple of relatively old databases that I happen to have
hanging around.

But I keep bumping into that restriction check that disallows
upgrading to a non-production release.

Can you remind me how I work around this in order to test the upgrade
with the release candidate?

thanks,

bryan


--------------CEC9B935E1B44AD2928677F1--