db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6638) Remove unnecessary use of reflection in SignatureChecker
Date Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:48:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14044556#comment-14044556

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6638:

At least when the javadoc tags are missing, the IDEs can detect it and warn us about it so
that we can fix it. :) If we add dummy javadoc tags, it will be harder to find those occurrences.

> Remove unnecessary use of reflection in SignatureChecker
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-6638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6638
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>         Attachments: derby-6638.diff, derby-6638.status
> Ca line 377 in SignatureChecker we use reflection to call DatabaseMetaData#getFunctionColumns.
This is no longer necessary after we removed support for JDR 169.
> {color:blue}
> [Update:] There are more occurrences of reflection that can be removed in this class.
> {color}

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message