db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (DERBY-6605) "Derby support for SQL-92 features" topic in Reference Manual needs updating
Date Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:48:02 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14027968#comment-14027968
] 

Kim Haase edited comment on DERBY-6605 at 6/11/14 8:46 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

After some offline discussion we agreed that for 10.11 we should just update the current topic
to make it correct for SQL-92. However, I filed DERBY-6609 to bring the documentation up to
date and cover our compliance with the most current SQL standard, probably 2011.


was (Author: chaase3):
After some offline discussion we agreed that for 10.11 we should just update the current topic
to make it correct for SQL-92. However, I will file another issue to bring the documentation
up to date and cover our compliance with the most current SQL standard, probably 2011. That
will be post-2011.

> "Derby support for SQL-92 features" topic in Reference Manual needs updating
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6605
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6605
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-6605.diff, rrefsql9241891.html
>
>
> The topic "Derby support for SQL-92 features" in the Reference Manual (http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.10/ref/rrefsql9241891.html)
seems not to have been substantively updated since about 2007.
> For one thing, the parenthesis "(non-deferrable)" needs to be removed from Table 8 (constraint
support). Also, I think we've supported natural joins for some time. 
> Could someone more knowledgeable than I am go through the items marked "No" and see if
any more need updating? I think those two might be the only ones, but I am not quite sure.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message