db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (DERBY-6598) Document permissions recommendations for JAR procedures
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:57:02 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Kim Haase updated DERBY-6598:

    Attachment: DERBY-6598.zip

Thanks for the advice, Knut! Attaching DERBY-6598.diff, DERBY-6598.stat, and DERBY-6598.zip,
with changes to the following:

M       src/devguide/rdevdeploy856948.dita
M       src/ref/rrefstorejarinstall.dita
M       src/ref/rrefstorejarremove.dita
M       src/ref/rrefstorejarreplace.dita

I welcome additional feedback.

> Document permissions recommendations for JAR procedures
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-6598
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6598.diff, DERBY-6598.stat, DERBY-6598.zip
> It's been recommended that we should make the documentation of the SQLJ.INSTALL_JAR procedure
(and SQLJ.REPLACE_JAR) state more explicitly that the privilege should only be granted to
trusted users. For example:
> "Since this procedure can be used to install arbitrary code that runs in the same Java
Virtual Machine as the Derby database engine, the execution privilege should only be granted
to trusted users."
> This needs to go into the Reference Manual topics on these procedures as well as other
locations where they are discussed.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message