db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6598) Document permissions recommendations for JAR procedures
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:07:03 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14026856#comment-14026856

Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6598:

Thanks, Knut.

Committed patch DERBY-6598-2.diff to documentation trunk at revision 1601744. 

> Document permissions recommendations for JAR procedures
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-6598
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6598
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6598-2.diff, DERBY-6598-2.stat, DERBY-6598-2.zip, DERBY-6598.diff,
DERBY-6598.stat, DERBY-6598.zip
> It's been recommended that we should make the documentation of the SQLJ.INSTALL_JAR procedure
(and SQLJ.REPLACE_JAR) state more explicitly that the privilege should only be granted to
trusted users. For example:
> "Since this procedure can be used to install arbitrary code that runs in the same Java
Virtual Machine as the Derby database engine, the execution privilege should only be granted
to trusted users."
> This needs to go into the Reference Manual topics on these procedures as well as other
locations where they are discussed.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message