db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (DERBY-3155) Support for SQL:2003 MERGE statement
Date Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:04:43 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-3155:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: derby-3155-48-aa-indexScan.diff

Attaching derby-3155-48-aa-indexScan.diff. This patch adds a test to verify that MERGE works
when an index scan is chosen for the target table and the row location has to come out of
the index row.

Touches the following file:

M       java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/MergeStatementTest.java


> Support for SQL:2003 MERGE statement
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3155
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Trejkaz
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>              Labels: derby_triage10_10
>         Attachments: MergeStatement.html, MergeStatement.html, MergeStatement.html, MergeStatement.html,
derby-3155-01-ac-grammar.diff, derby-3155-02-ag-fixParserWarning.diff, derby-3155-03-ae-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
derby-3155-03-af-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, derby-3155-03-ag-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
derby-3155-03-ah-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, derby-3155-04-ae-deleteAction.diff,
derby-3155-04-af-deleteAction.diff, derby-3155-05-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsTarget.diff,
derby-3155-06-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsSource.diff, derby-3155-07-ad-insertAction.diff,
derby-3155-08-ah-updateAction.diff, derby-3155-09-aa-correlationNames.diff, derby-3155-10-aa-correlationNames.diff,
derby-3155-11-ab-beforeTriggersCantFireMerge.diff, derby-3155-12-aa-canOmitInsertColumnList.diff,
derby-3155-13-aa-allowSystemAndTempTables.diff, derby-3155-14-aa-replaceCorrelationNamesOnLeftSideOfSETclauses.diff,
derby-3155-15-aa-replumbMergeResultSetCleanup.diff, derby-3155-16-aa-treatCurrentRowLocationNodeLikeBaseColumnNode.diff,
derby-3155-17-aa-serializingRowLocations.diff, derby-3155-18-aa-basicView.diff, derby-3155-19-aa-forbidSubqueriesInMatchedClauses.diff,
derby-3155-20-aa-reworkColumnMatching.diff, derby-3155-21-ac-cleanupAndForbidSynonyms.diff,
derby-3155-22-ad-testIdentifiersOnLeftSideOfSetClauses.diff, derby-3155-23-aa-forbidDerivedColumnLists.diff,
derby-3155-24-aa-supportParameters.diff, derby-3155-25-aa-parametersAsInsertValues.diff, derby-3155-26-aa-copyRowLocationForIndexScans.diff,
derby-3155-27-aa-adjustMatchingRefinements.diff, derby-3155-28-aa-cardinalityViolations.diff,
derby-3155-29-aa-missingSchema.diff, derby-3155-30-ab-moreCorrelationNames.diff, derby-3155-31-aa-deletePrivs.diff,
derby-3155-32-aa-newTestFunction.diff, derby-3155-33-ab-insertPrivs.diff, derby-3155-34-aa-updatePrivs.diff,
derby-3155-34-ab-updatePrivs.diff, derby-3155-35-aa-allPrivsTest.diff, derby-3155-36-aa-lockModeComment.diff,
derby-3155-37-aa-printSubNodes.diff, derby-3155-38-aa-datatypes.diff, derby-3155-39-aa-fixBuild.diff,
derby-3155-40-aa-bigLobs.diff, derby-3155-41-aa-nullGeneratedColumns.diff, derby-3155-42-aa-triggersAndGeneratedColumns.diff,
derby-3155-43-aa-eliminateDuplicateColumnRefs.diff, derby-3155-44-aa-lobsInTriggers.diff,
derby-3155-45-aa-serialization.diff, derby-3155-46-aa-deferredDeletes.diff, derby-3155-47-aa-collations.diff,
derby-3155-48-aa-indexScan.diff
>
>
> A relatively common piece of logic in a database application is to check for a row's
existence and then either update or insert depending on its existence.
> SQL:2003 added a MERGE statement to perform this operation.  It looks like this:
>     MERGE INTO table_name USING table_name ON (condition)
>     WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET column1 = value1 [, column2 = value2 ...]
>     WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT column1 [, column2 ...] VALUES (value1 [, value2 ...])

> At the moment, the only workaround for this would be to write a stored procedure to do
the same operation, or to implement the logic client-side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message