db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6376) Revise DatabaseMetaData section of Reference Manual
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:45:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13799147#comment-13799147
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on DERBY-6376:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1533468 from [~chaase3] in branch 'docs/branches/10.10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1533468 ]

DERBY-6376  Revise DatabaseMetaData section of Reference Manual

Merged DERBY-6376-2.diff to 10.10 doc branch from trunk revision 1533467.

> Revise DatabaseMetaData section of Reference Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6376
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.10.1.3, 10.11.0.0
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-6376-2.diff, DERBY-6376.diff, DERBY-6376.stat, DERBY-6376.zip,
rrefcrsrgpc1.html
>
>
> In a comment on DERBY-6369, Knut Anders Hatlen suggests that the topic "Parameters to
getProcedureColumns" (http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.10/ref/rrefpgc1.html) might be removed.
The purpose of the topics under "JDBC Reference" is to provide Derby-specific implementation
information. In this topic, however, the Derby-specific information seems to apply to other
methods as well: the information on catalogs and the information on name patterns.
> It may be that another topic in the same section, "java.sql.DatabaseMetaData.getProcedureColumns
method" (http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.10/ref/rrefgpc1.html), could also be removed.
Derby presumably supports other DatabaseMetaData methods that are not mentioned, such as getFunctionColumns
and, more recently, getAttributes (of UDTS) and getUDTs. Why mention this one only?
> The topic "Columns in the ResultSet returned by getProcedureColumns" (http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.10/ref/rrefcrsrgpc1.html)
does contain Derby-specific information, listing a couple of columns that are not listed in
the Java SE documentation on this method (see http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html).
So this topic needs to be retained.
> Some information could be added to the top-level "java.sql.DatabaseMetaData interface"
topic (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html) about needing
to specify null for catalog columns and perhaps about using the "%" wildcard to obtain a list
of all items in a particular namePattern field.
> Let me know if these changes don't make sense.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message