db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6121) Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:48:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13785294#comment-13785294
] 

Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6121:
----------------------------------

Thanks, Rick! I will commit this and then file a patch for the additional changes you suggest.

About JOIN operations links -- the usage there is consistent with what we have in the tableExpression
topic, though it should be singular, actually. But it would make sense to change both of them
to use "joinOperation".

Thanks for the info about the probable history behind that reference to the DECIMAL scalar
function. I'll remove the sentence.

I am fine with remaining inconsistent in our links to data type topics. The topics are easy
to find if a reader wants the info.


> Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6121
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6121-2.diff, DERBY-6121-2.stat, DERBY-6121-2.zip, DERBY-6121.diff,
DERBY-6121.stat, DERBY-6121.zip, rrefsqlj32268.html
>
>
> This issue came up during the buddy testing of user-defined aggregates. Here's what Dag
discovered:
>     identifiers (seen when looking at GRANT USAGE of aggregates): "table-Name" occurences
are linked to a section explainig them (rreftablename.html), but UDA names are defined in-lined
as 
>       GRANT USAGE ON DERBY AGGREGATE [ schemaName. ] SQL92Identifier TO grantees
>     In a third variant, 
>       GRANT EXECUTE ON { FUNCTION | PROCEDURE } routine-designator TO grantees
>     routine-designator is defined locally as 
>       routine-designator { function-name | procedure-name }  
>     without links to what "function-name" or "procedure-name" might look like. It would
be good to harmonize the latter two forms to a central definition as for "table-Name".
>     Finally, I noted that the definition page for SchemaName doesn't link to the SQL92Identifier
page... 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message