db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6121) Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
Date Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:54:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781898#comment-13781898
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on DERBY-6121:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1527603 from [~chaase3] in branch 'docs/branches/10.10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1527603 ]

DERBY-6121  Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual 

Merged patch DERBY-6121.diff to 10.10 doc branch from trunk revision 1527587.

> Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6121
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6121.diff, DERBY-6121.stat, DERBY-6121.zip, rrefsqlj32268.html
>
>
> This issue came up during the buddy testing of user-defined aggregates. Here's what Dag
discovered:
>     identifiers (seen when looking at GRANT USAGE of aggregates): "table-Name" occurences
are linked to a section explainig them (rreftablename.html), but UDA names are defined in-lined
as 
>       GRANT USAGE ON DERBY AGGREGATE [ schemaName. ] SQL92Identifier TO grantees
>     In a third variant, 
>       GRANT EXECUTE ON { FUNCTION | PROCEDURE } routine-designator TO grantees
>     routine-designator is defined locally as 
>       routine-designator { function-name | procedure-name }  
>     without links to what "function-name" or "procedure-name" might look like. It would
be good to harmonize the latter two forms to a central definition as for "table-Name".
>     Finally, I noted that the definition page for SchemaName doesn't link to the SQL92Identifier
page... 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message