Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D08D310B72 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 07:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52832 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 07:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 52459 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 07:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 52276 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2013 07:11:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 07:11:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 07:11:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-5766) BaseDataFileFactory.boot() should log the exception that causes it to boot the database read only MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13697570#comment-13697570 ] Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-5766: --------------------------------------- Hi Kathey, thanks for the feedback. I did not know about that property - or did you suggest adding it? Anyway, seems like a good idea. I guess maybe the same applies when "classpath" is in the connection url - if the same codepath is taken in that case. > BaseDataFileFactory.boot() should log the exception that causes it to boot the database read only > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-5766 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5766 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Store > Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0 > Reporter: Kathey Marsden > Labels: derby_triage10_10 > > In BaseDataFileFactory.boot() there is code that tries to write to the lock file. If it cannot, and gets an IOException it assumes the database is read only. I think that we should log that the database is booting read only and why and if it is not specifically a permission error log the exception stack trace. > > fileLockOnDB = fileLock.getRandomAccessFile( "rw"); > fileLock.limitAccessToOwner(); > // write it out for future reference > fileLockOnDB.writeUTF(myUUID.toString()); > fileLockOnDB.sync(); > fileLockOnDB.seek(0); > // check the UUID > UUID checkUUID = uuidFactory.recreateUUID(fileLockOnDB.readUTF()); > if (!checkUUID.equals(myUUID)) > { > throw StandardException.newException( > SQLState.DATA_MULTIPLE_JBMS_ON_DB, databaseDirectory); > } > } > catch (IOException ioe) > { > // probably a read only db, don't do anything more > readOnly = true; > try > { > if (fileLockOnDB != null) > fileLockOnDB.close(); > } > catch (IOException ioe2) > { /* did the best I could */ } > fileLockOnDB = null; > return; > } > I think this code can be exercised by creating a database and exiting without shutdown. Then change permission on the db.lck and dbex.lck files. It occurs often in the field when multiple users with incompatible permissions/umasks access the derby database. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira