db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ahsan shamsudeen <ahsan.competit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6291) Improve code coverage of org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement
Date Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:51:45 GMT
Hi Bryan,

Then O.k. Just Now, I understand what is meant by "named parameters".


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Bryan Pendleton (JIRA) <jira@apache.org>wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13715888#comment-13715888]
>
> Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-6291:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Hi Ahsan,
>
> I think that the only methods we should be specifically adding test
> cases for are the ones which take "String parameterName" in
> their signature, NOT the ones which take "int parameterIndex" or "int i".
>
> That is, I see this JIRA issue as specifically about adding a suite
> of test cases which cover the "named parameters" APIs in the
> CallableStatement interface, and those are the ones which have
> "String parameterName" in their interface.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> thanks,
>
> bryan
>
>
> > Improve code coverage of
>  org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: DERBY-6291
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291
> >             Project: Derby
> >          Issue Type: Sub-task
> >          Components: JDBC
> >            Reporter: ahsan shamsudeen
> >            Assignee: ahsan shamsudeen
> >            Priority: Minor
> >              Labels: derby_triage10_11
> >         Attachments: DERBY-6291.patch, setIntPatch.txt,
> UPDATED-DERBY-6291.patch
> >
> >
> > According to code coverage analysis,
> org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement is
> > exercised poorly by of our regression tests. The current coverage report
> for this class can be found at
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/a9.html
> > This task is to investigate this class, and either remove the unused
> code, or add
> > regression test that exercise the code, as appropriate.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>

Mime
View raw message