db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: [vote]Re: Should DERBY take advantage of infra's offer of some svn/JIRA integration
Date Thu, 30 May 2013 22:01:51 GMT
On 5/30/2013 9:23 AM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rick Hillegas <rick.hillegas@oracle.com
> <mailto:rick.hillegas@oracle.com>> wrote:
>     I agree with Knut that this is a procedural issue which could be
>     handled by a lazy consensus vote:
>     http://www.apache.org/__foundation/voting.html
>     <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> . Although we've been
>     discussing the topic for a couple days, we haven't done so under the
>     aegis of a formal vote. Thanks to Myrna for offering to call the
>     lazy consensus vote and then file the INFRA issue afterward. The
>     vote will only add 72 hours of delay to the process.
>     Thanks,
>     -Rick
> It's not actually clear to me whether for a lazy consensus vote on a
> procedural issue, you should include 'vote' in the subject, but I did -
> I now officially state that if no one objects within 3 days, I'll go
> ahead and log a JIRA issue for INFRA to implement the svn/jira changes
> described on http://www.apache.org/dev/svngit2jira.html.
> Note that this will only apply to commits going forward. Mike did ask
> infra about going backwards, and they came back with the following:
> "Someone should be able to whip up a script to
> retroactively update jiras with commit information by adding comments...
> I don't think infra needs to be involved in this, even, except perhaps
> if the script author will accidentally get himself banned for abuse."
> So if someone wants to figure out how to make such a script please
> volunteer, for now this will only affect commits going forward.
> Myrna

View raw message