Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2AF0FDC4 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42831 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2013 16:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 42804 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2013 16:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 42797 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2013 16:36:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:36:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bpendleton.derby@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.50] (HELO mail-pa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.220.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:36:53 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id bg2so1916649pad.9 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MaPv6MtHRNP5o/vzqeYabkzV0H73onOBF+oAjva4Kpg=; b=CU9WVPEiZHFanowbVS6KY25J/qwFLlMfFz6mXBSSXSdvN7FTPrssTVaIcwmDaOsWTg 16cMExBv9uA6eHbgodVVYZjSBvUuTkuAX+ZrrJQ4Iq9+ebzm/OxbenbApPkE0xdTX184 RfZhhNTEyVsuTnme5LmdJxjLBE/NFvkGuu8DqKF2pbNM8m/2qgdG17MOnuSECmywiBKO slmJaX/ha/iTciJ5l/rNT/O+cQIBtVCrH9nnfzE4KdxOX6eVEPsSP+yXe9yOgtLC44AM StcG91cNmcqTVLpDYxy4FjD62Fq9fPM5rHQnpGpieKiAH6egI1gTBWTECyl1sxM351k2 MkTg== X-Received: by 10.66.228.105 with SMTP id sh9mr21019097pac.65.1365870992888; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (c-67-170-231-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.170.231.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uy3sm7388670pbc.7.2013.04.13.09.36.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <516988BB.3050807@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:32:59 -0700 From: Bryan Pendleton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release References: <51486ECA.9060805@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <51486ECA.9060805@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. +1 to this release; thanks all for the hard work! I share the community's concern with DERBY-6092; however I think that JDK 1.5 is quite old now, and users who might encounter DERBY-6092 can find several workarounds, and can also simply grab the fix from the 10.10 branch. It's also fine with me if we wait to pick up that fix and create a new release. So I'm +1 either way :) thanks, bryan