Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19AE5F5D4 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67156 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2013 17:44:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 67126 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2013 17:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 67119 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2013 17:44:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:44:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.44.172] (HELO nm19-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.44.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:44:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.44.103] by nm19.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 17:43:55 -0000 Received: from [67.195.14.110] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 17:43:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp107.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 17:43:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1365183835; bh=3G+CyXRM22tqHr7tGBKUURgcNe8dQBssPKe2jRIF4ds=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=q9aY+ZY3TYUWFcfjhPzIfEUkFabcmQA70eYSdlot9cGwRzrDFgbdNW2jWPgLjOq/GcMmpFod2f/H+CjLPNgXdvXbTEepQOGVfMjG/HCsVCp5+3JK3naClKNozIuggJwn1aUZP3csg5H4iFx24v9CRg6JO9bU4SJYnA5vXMPbfJs= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 197448.90004.bm@smtp107.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: eGD.2z8VM1kurDNwQBQDsY4o3sswhzXJOyv6Gj_4KphT7Tv mOBIZ0X4S3u6wpM58GD6VcEKabqfH60YpBuTXs5GFxoMSYnGqVNuGCQfrcQW ZLxQDjdLanU5hhNeQoJCiTHAG1AMBsDarLIe8iVDHJ7QwL53HZZiOmuLXYbj aNLu89eniEvTUF1XniX_19IRUs5uuOVeHfr2c5nP6cv9CZ52pT_3giyKUKk_ IiRDaohQz_Yjq602B38PdYnQL9rKc6BgHjiXcTOAKambk8k2fddgw92y3ynD ZtI76YohnNS4ksxURqlh_VCyjo5cCVc5BjB5uSHSWUUrXvAmPynULZNZmMYA a.FU9iibpEj4IzrsbRiUJJ4dyUF1teD_dMkrXzVRNqiR.rCU0hKpuycBlBH5 ny7jT2RFlgwOw7w5sykNNiwdzdW8gEZg34eEpd2tH.4YFEba1BkmLcIudDXv sgnCO7pj5OJ3G_tsrFdmk9sSOdKDKEe26r0DyR4gA9a0PX3Ywx5BTZREnTao _kihZvZ9LFK4CUfTcb4KzpfRVMMJr6IDFGpwlusV1Zg_9ucFBv79nRkb0mVk mWFynoYlLF9xdRIZz8HXx0WhFyCCe2o7hME6UWHxDMZKga1GcDbfmEaIXM1l 0AA03AijxkK5JRi55Qdq7_Df2_7AveyOfr0euMefM.L1huvkjSdxEA4y30Y7 ft1TSocLo0c6Qi7gO0Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 0mCmWXSswBCWOCMKYdwRsTx1yUFXw1u4Y1Itob3JXDF8Loh0 X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.37] (mikem_app@24.23.246.126 with plain) by smtp107.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Apr 2013 10:43:55 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <515F0D5B.8090600@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:43:55 -0700 From: Mike Matrigali User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: concern about nightly test failures on 10.10 branch prior to release. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have been looking at nightly results of the last few weeks, with an eye to making sure 10.10 release does not have regressions over previous releases. I think in the past we have tried to get clean nightly test runs before making a release. It is a problem as there are known intermittent errors, which make it hard to know if errors are regressions or not. Looking at the public nightly test runs for 10.10 I see: Java DB Testing: http://download.java.net/javadesktop/derby/10.10.html currently has 1 in a row clean recent runs, 3 out of most recent 7 have failures. I think it is only running on checkins, so testing of intermittent bugs is sparse. IBM Testing: http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_10/windows/derbyall_history.html http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_10/windows/suites.All_history.html http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_10/linux/derbyall_history.html http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_10/linux/suites.All_history.html currently has 0 in a row clean recent runs, and I don't think there has been a "clean" day for 2 weeks. I have not had time to look at all the failures, to determine if they are regressions or not. While not totally clean the 10.9 runs for the IBM Testing are much cleaner, so just using that metric it seems 10.10 is not ready to ship.: http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_9/windows/suites.All_history.html