db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6128) Examine Derby classes to determine if we need to add serialVersionUID to any of them
Date Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:37:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13632989#comment-13632989
] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-6128:
--------------------------------------

Hi Mike: It don't think that derby-6128-ecpds40 has been checked in yet.
                
> Examine Derby classes to determine if we need to add serialVersionUID to any of them
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6128
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: JDBC
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: derby-6128-ecpds40.diff, SerializableLister.java
>
>
> The discussion on DERBY-6124 has raised the possibility that we may need to add serialVersionUIDs
to some serializable Derby classes. Without the serialVersionUIDs, Derby may encounter deserialization
errors on objects which were serialized by one version of Derby or the JVM and then deserialized
by another version of Derby or the JVM.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message