db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bryan Pendleton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6075) Use modern collections in impl/sql/compile
Date Sat, 23 Mar 2013 01:05:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13611497#comment-13611497
] 

Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-6075:
----------------------------------------

> I seem to be getting about 15-20% better results

That's great news!

But, can I say that I'm skeptical?

That seems like a dramatically larger change that I had anticipated.
                
> Use modern collections in impl/sql/compile
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6075
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6075
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Compile.java, d6075-10a-aggregate-vectors.diff, d6075-11a-remaining-vectors.diff,
d6075-12a-stack.diff, d6075-13a-unused-properties.diff, d6075-14a-dead-syntax.diff, d6075-15a-sqlgrammar-vectors.diff,
d6075-16a-negative-test.diff, d6075-17a-rename-aggregate-vectors.diff, d6075-1a-CollectNodesVisitor.diff,
d6075-2a-bindExpression.diff, d6075-3a-javadoc.diff, d6075-4a-parameterList.diff, d6075-5a-ordering.diff,
d6075-6a-DMLModStatementNode.diff, d6075-7a-more-signatures.diff, d6075-8a-local-hashtables.diff,
d6075-9a-hashtable-fields.diff
>
>
> The code in the org.apache.derby.impl.sql.compile package predates the Java Collections
Framework and uses old-style collections like java.util.Vector and java.util.Hashtable. Since
the old-style collection classes are used in many method signatures, it's difficult to use
modern collection classes when adding new code.
> I suggest we switch to using interfaces (like java.util.List and java.util.Map) instead
of specific classes in the signatures, so that we have more flexibility in choosing the right
collection class for the job.
> Only changing the signatures would allow us to continue using Vector and Hashtable, since
they implement the interfaces. However, I think it would be good to switch to ArrayList and
HashMap in a second step. The instances in impl/sql/compile are not shared between threads,
so we don't need the synchronization provided by the old-style classes. Switching to unsynchronized
classes may make compilation slightly faster.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message