db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From drv <drvyv...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Limitations of Table Functions vs. old VTIs?
Date Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:30:12 GMT
Hi Rick -

My mistake with the package name requirement with 10.8. VTIs still need to
reside in "com.ibm.db2j".
I'm surprised because from memory I thought that was no longer the case... -
maybe the restriction had only omitted by mistake with some re-factoring in
an intermediary version..

Thank you for the context handle tip.. I'll give that a go for now to try
and get the info we need.
I'll raise a feature request for more info to be passed through "officially"
in future too - perhaps via an extensible structure.. e.g.
HashMap<key->Object> where keys are constants on some class and can be added
easily between releases...

Unfortunately we have no way to solve the rigid "static table shape" issue


View this message in context: http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Limitations-of-Table-Functions-vs-old-VTIs-tp127988p128121.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message