Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205.282687.1360741093172@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6061) Upgrade language is inconsistent
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=3Dcom.atlassian=
.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1357=
7394#comment-13577394 ]=20

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-6061:
--------------------------------------

For the simplified Chinese, you can remove this character ("hard"): =E7=A1=
=AC
For traditional Chinese you can remove these two characters
("enforced"): =E5=BC=B7=E5=88=B6

Netbeans let's you edit the properties files directly, but
unfortunately, it changes all the hex encoding to another case :(
In any case, we know now they do contain the "hard" adverb (to the
extend the word category applies for Chinese.. ;-)

Thanks,
Dag


               =20
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-2.diff, DERBY-6061=
-2.zip, DERBY-6061-3.diff, DERBY-6061-code2.diff, DERBY-6061-code2.stat, DE=
RBY-6061-code.diff, DERBY-6061.diff, DERBY-6061.stat, DERBY-6061.zip
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "so=
ft". I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was cha=
nged to "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. Ther=
e are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there=
.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that k=
ind of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good al=
ternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all =
think makes sense.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato=
rs
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira