Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205.247310.1360082771666@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12630173.1359650381205@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (DERBY-6061) Upgrade language is inconsistent
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kim Haase updated DERBY-6061:
-----------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-6061-code2.stat
                DERBY-6061-code2.diff
                DERBY-6061-2.diff
                DERBY-6061.zip
                DERBY-6061.stat

Attaching DERBY-6061-2.diff, DERBY-6061.stat, and DERBY-6061.zip, with the following Developer's Guide changes:

D       src/devguide/tdevupgradesoft.dita
M       src/devguide/cdevcsecureroles.dita
M       src/devguide/tdevupgradedb.dita
M       src/devguide/derbydev.ditamap

Also attaching DERBY-6061-code2.diff and DERBY-6061-code2.stat, with the following code changes:

M       java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages.xml
M       java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_it.properties
M       java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/ErrorCodeTest.java

I hope these help make the upgrade documentation and terminology more clear and consistent.
                
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-2.diff, DERBY-6061-code2.diff, DERBY-6061-code2.stat, DERBY-6061-code.diff, DERBY-6061.diff, DERBY-6061.stat, DERBY-6061.zip
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes sense.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira