db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6066) Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for Connection.getTransactionIsolation
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:41:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13582406#comment-13582406
] 

Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-6066:
----------------------------------------

I am wondering what the community thinks of 
1)going ahead and commiting the changes for switching from statement to prepared statement
for getTraqnsactionIsolation 
2)and creating a separate issue to find out why the code is not getting used anymore after
the commit for DERBY-4314 went in.
                
> Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for Connection.getTransactionIsolation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Client
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: DERBY6066_patch1_diff.txt, DERBY6066_patch2_diff.txt
>
>
> This jira is similar to DERBY-6053 but for o.a.d.client.am.Connection.getTransactionIsolation.
Use prepared statement rather than regular statement every time user makes a get transaction
isolation call.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message