db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6066) Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for Connection.getTransactionIsolation
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:55:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581207#comment-13581207
] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6066:
-------------------------------------------

Do you understand why the changes in TableLockBasicTest are needed? The last part of the statement
name is based on the section number, so the patch seems to have increased the number of sections
needed in this test, which sounds counterintuitive to me.
                
> Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for Connection.getTransactionIsolation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Client
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: DERBY6066_patch1_diff.txt
>
>
> This jira is similar to DERBY-6053 but for o.a.d.client.am.Connection.getTransactionIsolation.
Use prepared statement rather than regular statement every time user makes a get transaction
isolation call.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message