db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6061) Upgrade language is inconsistent
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:31:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13571336#comment-13571336

Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6061:

Thanks for all the great advice. I will revise the Dev Guide topic and add to the code patch.
While I am at it, I notice there is one other reference to hard upgrade in messages that I
can find.

java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_it.properties:08004.C.6=L''utente ''{0}'' non pu\u00F2
eseguire l''aggiornamento hard del database ''{1}''. Solo il proprietario del database pu\u00F2
eseguire questa operazione.

Interestingly, the other European-language properties files that contain this message don't
seem to have the problem:

java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_de_DE.properties:08004.C.6=Benutzer ''{0}'' kann
kein Upgrade der Datenbank ''{1}'' erzwingen. Hierzu ist nur der Datenbankeigent\u00FCmer
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_es.properties:08004.C.6=El usuario ''{0}'' no puede
realizar una actualizaci\u00F3n completa de la base de datos ''{1}''. S\u00F3lo el propietario
de la base de datos puede realizar esta operaci\u00F3n.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_fr.properties:08004.C.6=L''utilisateur ''{0}'' ne
peut pas effectuer une mise \u00E0 niveau mat\u00E9rielle de la base de donn\u00E9es ''{1}''.
Seul le propri\u00E9taire de la base de donn\u00E9es peut effectuer cette op\u00E9ration.

German and French just use plain "upgrade"; Spanish uses "full upgrade" (how clever). I'm
helpless with the Asian ones, though.

New patches will be coming.

> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-6061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-code.diff, DERBY-6061.diff
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think
we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a
more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard"
in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade.
Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message