db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6061) Upgrade language is inconsistent
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:31:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13571336#comment-13571336
] 

Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6061:
----------------------------------

Thanks for all the great advice. I will revise the Dev Guide topic and add to the code patch.
While I am at it, I notice there is one other reference to hard upgrade in messages that I
can find.

java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_it.properties:08004.C.6=L''utente ''{0}'' non pu\u00F2
eseguire l''aggiornamento hard del database ''{1}''. Solo il proprietario del database pu\u00F2
eseguire questa operazione.

Interestingly, the other European-language properties files that contain this message don't
seem to have the problem:

java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_de_DE.properties:08004.C.6=Benutzer ''{0}'' kann
kein Upgrade der Datenbank ''{1}'' erzwingen. Hierzu ist nur der Datenbankeigent\u00FCmer
berechtigt.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_es.properties:08004.C.6=El usuario ''{0}'' no puede
realizar una actualizaci\u00F3n completa de la base de datos ''{1}''. S\u00F3lo el propietario
de la base de datos puede realizar esta operaci\u00F3n.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_fr.properties:08004.C.6=L''utilisateur ''{0}'' ne
peut pas effectuer une mise \u00E0 niveau mat\u00E9rielle de la base de donn\u00E9es ''{1}''.
Seul le propri\u00E9taire de la base de donn\u00E9es peut effectuer cette op\u00E9ration.

German and French just use plain "upgrade"; Spanish uses "full upgrade" (how clever). I'm
helpless with the Asian ones, though.

New patches will be coming.

                
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-code.diff, DERBY-6061.diff
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think
we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a
more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard"
in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade.
Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes
sense.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message