db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-6061) Upgrade language is inconsistent
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:48:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13570715#comment-13570715
] 

Mike Matrigali commented on DERBY-6061:
---------------------------------------

i am wondering why you would remove the sentence about roles, the point of soft upgrade is
that it is possible that users of the current release
software may still have databases that are at a version level prior to 10.5.
                
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-code.diff, DERBY-6061.diff
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think
we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a
more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard"
in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade.
Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes
sense.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message