Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
  h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=vCQIMYnG/gXkGWw7MWs5AsrnJHe/nRVP0rq3n449XiN8l1rgJP4zMbv0Ia3LcBIqku9H/1R72MZqdxq0TZFSDeJpLnvUj01ZxYiXyr5DqAXkfIxkQuWfIvo3jp6+czpxQEfkrSkM+n5XGIvZHAeJoZ7H4OFInOwrTJoH+5cxSxQ=
  ;
Message-ID: <502057A8.7090306@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:47:52 -0700
From: Katherine Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: Coverage of package impl.io
References: 
 <CAHuvxeW30o5qjZvF6uRm__C2bpgazyjM0Nu5345E_Y9i3tLDig@mail.gmail.com>
 <50204BDF.6040708@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <50204BDF.6040708@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 8/6/2012 3:57 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 6:40 AM, siddharth srivastava wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> While looking at this package, I was able to derive some reference
>> from util.corruptio package and its subsequent usage.
>> What would be a recommended approach for improving the test coverage
>> of this class.
>>
>> I have started with URLFile and DirStorageFactory, out of which
>> DirStorageFactory is already very well covered.
>> It would be helpful to get recommendations for writing tests for this 
>> package.
> So looking at URLFile and URLStorageFactory these seem to be for a 
> http(s) protocol connection, which sounds great but I don't 
> immediately see what protocol I would use.  For example, I have a 
> toursdb database at
> http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/toursdb
>
> What URL would I use to access this?
>
> I don't see anything in the doc. I wonder if this is something that 
> someone started working on but never finished?
>
>
>
I thought this sounded familiar.  The http sub protocol came up in this 
thread.
http://old.nabble.com/Bug-with-http-sub-protocol--td31889839.html

which concluded two things.
1)  the http/https sub protocols are not documented anywhere.
2)  I can connect to my database with this odd url:

ij> connect 'jdbc:derby:https:http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/toursdb';

The user was encouraged to open an issue but did not as far as I can 
tell.  I filed an issue DERBY-5895 to fix/test/document the feature.  
Subtasks can be created for each.

In terms of testing, I wondering what would be best.  Should we have 
properties like we do for the ldap testing to specify the server etc or 
is there an easy way to integrate a single threaded web server into the 
JUnit tests?


Kathey