Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <437640935.90091.1343027494750.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
In-Reply-To: <238362080.85642.1342862194570.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (DERBY-5872) Inconsistency between isWrapperFor()
 and unwrap() in logical statements
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-5872.
---------------------------------------

          Resolution: Fixed
       Fix Version/s: 10.10.0.0
    Issue & fix info:   (was: Patch Available)

Committed revision 1364524.
                
> Inconsistency between isWrapperFor() and unwrap() in logical statements
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5872
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5872
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.1.3, 10.5.1.1, 10.6.1.0, 10.7.1.1, 10.8.1.2, 10.9.1.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>             Fix For: 10.10.0.0
>
>         Attachments: derby-5872-1a.diff
>
>
> I noticed this when I refactored the logical statement classes in DERBY-5868. The isWrapperFor() method forwards calls to the underlying physical statement, but the unwrap() method works purely at the logical level.
> For example, if you produce a LogicalPreparedStatement40 instance with this code
>         ClientConnectionPoolDataSource ds = new ClientConnectionPoolDataSource();
>         ds.setDatabaseName("testdb");
>         ds.setCreateDatabase("create");
>         ds.setMaxStatements(10);
>         PooledConnection pc = ds.getPooledConnection();
>         Connection c = pc.getConnection();
>         PreparedStatement ps = c.prepareStatement("values 1");
> you'll see that
>         System.out.println(ps.isWrapperFor(LogicalPreparedStatement40.class));
> prints false, telling that ps is not a wrapper for LogicalPreparedStatement40. However, trying to unwrap ps as a LogicalPreparedStatement succeeds:
>         LogicalPreparedStatement40 lps = ps.unwrap(LogicalPreparedStatement40.class);
> On the other hand
>         System.out.println(ps.isWrapperFor(PreparedStatement40.class));
> prints true, indicating that ps is a wrapper for PreparedStatement40, but trying to unwrap it as one, fails:
>         PreparedStatement40 ps4 = ps.unwrap(PreparedStatement40.class);
> Exception in thread "main" java.sql.SQLException: Unable to unwrap for 'class org.apache.derby.client.am.PreparedStatement40'
> 	at org.apache.derby.client.am.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(SQLExceptionFactory40.java:108)
> 	at org.apache.derby.client.am.SqlException.getSQLException(SqlException.java:364)
> 	at org.apache.derby.client.am.LogicalStatementEntity.unwrap(LogicalStatementEntity.java:258)
> 	at org.apache.derby.client.am.LogicalPreparedStatement.unwrap(LogicalPreparedStatement.java:57)
> 	at Test.main(Test.java:37)
> Caused by: org.apache.derby.client.am.SqlException: Unable to unwrap for 'class org.apache.derby.client.am.PreparedStatement40'
> 	... 3 more

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira