db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Alternative code coverage report using JaCoCo
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:36:32 GMT
> I've been looking into adding support for JaCoCo [1] for Derby

Thanks for investigating this, Kristian.

I looked at the report you published, and I found it clear and
easy to read.

Why would we choose one tool over another? Is there a reason to
trust the reports produced by one tool more than those produced
by another? Is it easier to configure or lower-overhead to operate
one tool versus the other?

Or are you just anticipating that Emma will fall into disrepair
over time?

thanks,

bryan


Mime
View raw message