Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE219E7B for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28118 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2012 18:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28059 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2012 18:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28052 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2012 18:31:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:31:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.212.189] (HELO nm30.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.212.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:31:05 +0000 Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm30.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 May 2012 18:30:44 -0000 Received: from [209.191.108.96] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 May 2012 18:30:44 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.96] by t3.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 May 2012 18:30:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 May 2012 18:30:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 284671.58216.bm@omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57176 invoked from network); 30 May 2012 18:30:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TwBIyLJ5wQPpNucaKw4EpBz6sKgJgQrZ6zddZnC5QfAlsSEL2wCFC9gw8KiraMzwARcuv3+ZrqXDoeVuZZF3m7tmETsr6ixqiC46BDB/hk+bxY/AG9+PowzkjaInc6IyHZqMxnuMcM4pSXpkSzX6usyA6sfCZxe3LyNUV1ao+q0= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1338402644; bh=3QOPsiq6lwaSyrsvSQiq8zG4kKa69VcyPxRLVaRjVy0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PeFc3dJmBeV3vHxdFzoYw654LonQabjFjvpI9p6YktrQcn/CC+11s7a1g0DCPsup3cf94AfCOJllpS4O3EV90+GO3Hi30uOcc/ccHMg7ytlZqaD+9qmsOWBsUfdQH8+Aa+TH1OiFuB2x0PSkxMtelz/qgwccqC9Hn+8H/plNTn4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _GPb5yMVM1lV5RJhCO2YYdjWLD3nswPL4xpg7.xq7_5F4jm ZpItDnNoJtl1uSaKNFMIsdTeoHREeiV8Kn5vBSOrWHtX0W8xjXrD9ujbeT1g GN8oF7WspYTB8qMvMHOU4C0AO4uwMx_UVNF0a_NLPZvLHl7r9FHW.AVae8Dd B79pPcx8V57pV4gY.wrsahP75pgvrISVIyiNDhnmpog5DOgYw_SCwlEEkuGH eFDV1O.QB8vNoS1PxkXJPv7HVQgoD7cb.dOYuPAph_otI5JM0hm1b0lULXf4 IRJpmvFpO6xTioDswT490CugCUQ_.OMspWzte6VRBkXwOlOWU4AwjVnLD4.S UENtlsSiw8qNI3ZPViofoyZhESB8EqYvry1jXXHNQAlph71mL.yVH6b4_0C4 1CSLMzLAlSGS7iyHWtynPjgJeFkn_Hmujuke0hyjmKs_U6AJm8.JBoMrfT9G zflLDWVUZ X-Yahoo-SMTP: 0mCmWXSswBCWOCMKYdwRsTx1yUFXw1u4Y1Itob3JXDF8Loh0 Received: from [9.72.139.186] (mikem_app@32.97.110.61 with plain) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 May 2012 11:30:44 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4FC66750.5090609@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:30:40 -0700 From: Mike Matrigali User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: 10.9 status References: <4FC65522.7090709@oracle.com> <4FC65E56.90101@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4FC65E56.90101@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We had machine/config issues last night on nightly machines and are resolving them now. Linux runs were good and should be posted soon. Windows failed and new results won't be available until tommorow. /mikem On 5/30/2012 10:52 AM, Mike Matrigali wrote: > I added comment to issue, but basically I am waiting on good trunk > nightly test results at sun and ibm. This is what I usually do before > doing any backport. > > /mikem > > On 5/30/2012 10:13 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote: >> What is the status of DERBY-5494? Can we port the patch to 10.9, resolve >> the issue, and build a 10.9.1 release candidate? >> >> Thanks, >> -Rick >> > >