db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mohamed Nufail <nufai...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Code coverage for client.net package
Date Wed, 23 May 2012 05:23:38 GMT
Thank you. I will go through those and come up with a solution.

regards,
Nufail.

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton.derby@gmail.com
> wrote:

> If only such little functionality is utilized, having those two classes is
>> a waste. The new solution sounds much better.
>>
>> So shall I proceed with the suggested solution?
>>
>
> Yes, I think that would be great!
>
> As Knut Anders observed, these two classes were created
> fairly recently.
>
> You might start by reviewing the original change that
> created these two files, and the JIRA entry that tracked
> the discussion around that change, so that you have all
> the background as to why those classes were created in
> that fashion.
>
> Then you could explore the options that Knut Anders suggested,
> or perhaps after your studies you will have a different
> solution to propose.
>
> I believe that the change/JIRA information to examine is this:
>
> $ svn log InputStreamUtil.java
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> ------------
> r899819 | rhillegas | 2010-01-15 13:32:14 -0800 (Fri, 15 Jan 2010) | 1 line
>
> DERBY-4491: Fix sealing violation which kills the AssertFailureTest on
> runs against insane jar files.
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> ------------
>
> We'll be looking forward to hear what you learn as you study this.
>
> thanks,
>
> bryan
>
>


-- 

Mohamed Nufail
Undergraduate,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
University of Moratuwa.
Blog: http://www.nufailm.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message