Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rick.hillegas@oracle.com
 designates 141.146.126.227 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F8F2A68.7070405@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:56:08 -0700
From: Rick Hillegas <rick.hillegas@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: 10.9 release
References: <4F85AE41.7010307@oracle.com> <4F85B157.5060901@sbcglobal.net>
 <4F85B897.2030404@oracle.com> <4F8F0686.9060101@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F8F0686.9060101@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/18/12 11:23 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
> ...
>
> I can get DERBY-5565 in, but won't have time to pick up the other two 
> before the proposed release candidate date.     Might someone else be 
> able to pick these up? I think they are small high value items but 
> have to be done in feature release I think.
>
I agree that data corruptions are the top priority, with highest 
priority going to ones with repros like DERBY-5565. I see 13 data 
corruptions on this list: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12313481

Thanks,
-Rick