Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4871B9815 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28445 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28416 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28406 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2012 16:12:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.94.237.214] (HELO nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:03 +0000 Received: from [66.94.237.201] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Apr 2012 16:11:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.244.49] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Apr 2012 16:11:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Apr 2012 16:11:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1334160702; bh=B7yu2GApOsd6x+m2nXT8DfJyaR4ANK7+sw0577+4zp4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=D+DgoVS/CM3qFStinChRVK5y+xaNhIJuYmqlIs+dFI9wRZqSQgKcopWvHB2GAbTvd6+sWDNxetddvFwxYJU+UOC1loy02EGf8lqZJEjo7o9Repjx50uuyJAepWFoiptydLWrBhEBXBwQkEYTiWSr9kH23ZW9Vp4wchVjPn1Vaxw= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 29229.2915.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lCFxAG4VM1mQdD_uSFTzm8nBur9qK1NWtSRtGDP1JIVutfz 9q1mi_T9FLJc_fbAcfv5GwaSol0uYmlvCH1U65px_TG3GoaPwODM6kh8klSv 06ftypZ6U59Fxm02iaXuTQ252b.3rwjVeyR6emTpqDkMVSFrWRlnsAVya7Ob fUonXj7kcwJZKwQhDquhVu9W2IYUt2lbk6YefOK87pVvHIpwPO1diTtFUCY5 7UJmU3cWOPCfkgKUBtWqSaFh8h4j9Vey_ufJYbONNIFKabodGXjg8b8llsqS rkJe1NEKSw48wtb155FmKuaJNbZYjO0fSP3igYg5tEvrgU.EfCD2aSY2.xKN pwRDK0BizW7JsNFXBSIde7ATvpX5v5VSEtBt5Ax4PwnKi.Pprnp.ve8l9oSv axKVJDJ5Mlt6vIOFfhgXXl3qKU_5YhxkMFbOZ4c2aOoUDSve8_j58pAqxK1E pTIce8pJP_GZ82Rhx6zmH X-Yahoo-SMTP: fBd8VESswBBwVkX.d9lIdXduzED_6kJxUAzIjM21tL._95FbORG0yg-- Received: from [9.72.139.205] (kmarsdenderby@32.97.110.61 with plain) by smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2012 09:11:41 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4F85AD2B.4000207@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:11:23 -0700 From: Katherine Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: re:Mohamed Nufail proposal (was Re: GSoC 2012 - To potential student applicants on the list) References: <4F7DD9F0.4040008@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/11/2012 4:37 AM, Tiago Espinha wrote: > Hi Nufail, > Kathey and Bryan, feel free to contribute your thoughts about Nufail's > and Siddharth's proposals. The more input we have, the better. > Hi Mohamed, One important thing is that the proposal in the melange tool has been updated vs the one in google docs that is available to the general community. Please update your google docs document to match your formal proposal so the whole community can see. I like the revised proposal better with a more intense focus on client code coverage and OSGI functional testing coverage. I wonder what is the approach for adding OSGi tests? Is this something that can easily be incorporated into our JUnit framework. I have to admit I am totally inexperienced in this area, so welcome not only the promise of some coverage but education in this area as well. Thanks Kathey